by   |    |   5 minutes  |  in Energy, Utilities & Resources   |  tagged ,

The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic is not the type of thing enterprise technologists could see in our magic crystal ball. As we do each year, I and other IFS experts in January issued our predictions for our respective sectors for the coming year, but a global shutdown of business, transport and daily life was not one of the things we anticipated. But as I revisit energy sector predictions I made in January, some of them will hold up better than others, although some may come to pass sooner and others will simply be delayed.

Surging renewables

Due in part to increasing demand for energy, I had predicted for the second year in a row that the growth of renewables in the energy mix would increase by double digits till 2024. Of course demand for oil & gas has cratered as the world stays home, but I think we can stand by the prediction on renewable energy, even though it is higher than some other predictions that put growth more in line of past performance of 5.5 percent annual growth or 7.9 percent between 2018 and 2019. I also mentioned the importance of companies diversifying their energy mix to remain relevant and sustainable in the long term. This trend is continuing apace and we see some emerging leaders riding in on renewable power and major energy companies already pivoting some of their capacity to renewables,  although exceptions holdout, according to Platt’s. If nothing else, renewables will grow even faster than before as a percentage of energy consumed given the hit being taken by the oil and gas sector.

The International Energy Authority have revised their prediction for monthly oil demand for 2020 compared to 2019, although they suggest demand will return to normal towards the end of this year. Commercial airlines, some manufacturing and personal automobiles are all idled right now, cratering demand even as a global price war drove down price. Now, outputs like gasoline are at prices unheard of for decades, but demand is inelastic due to stay-at-home orders across much of the world. Some demand patterns will come back slowly, but as stated the IEA is optimistic in the intermediate term.

Energy Sector Post COVID-19

The immediate impact on the oil industry is hard to deny. Diamond Drilling filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, citing the price war and coronavirus. Oil and gas producers are scaling back investment plans globally, are drawing back their capital investment programs. According to Natural Gas Intelligence, an index of United States exploration and production companies plans to scale back their capital spending by 8 percent or about $$8.3 billion.  Some parts of the industry will continue to invest more than others, with offshore expected to do better than shale, in part because capital investments here will not pay off for another two to five years. As contracts are terminated, the flexibility to stack and preserve assets, managing opex and margins while ensuring safety and that critical maintenance is performed becomes even more crucial focus for upstream asset owners.

With oil having traded below zero, the only substantial growth area for the sector in the immediate term may be storage as globally there is a shortage of capacity to hold onto oil pumped from the ground since it is not being consumed. So, while fabrication of new floating production and storage and offloading vessels is on hold, I am aware of at least one FPSO vessel under contract that is now to be converted specifically for storage. We may see several more of these projects converted to storage-only, or existing FPSO vessels used strictly for storage until there is somewhere to go with oil until demand returns.

Adding value

While we will always need energy, current times are proof that the tradition commodities-based generation methods are impacted by fluctuations in price. That is one reason many energy utilities have expanded into value added services that drive new revenue and give customers a reason to prefer them. This is particularly a strong trend in Europe and the United Kingdom, where a more open retail market enables customers to choose from whom they should buy their energy. And customers are demanding suppliers focus on environmental aspects including sustainability, emissions and the drive to a carbon neutral economy.

Given the COVID-19 pandemic, utilities that also want to deliver appliance or equipment repair services to customers will benefit from adopting technologies like remote assistance, which can either guide customers through repair and maintenance projects or give a technician on-site access experts who can consult from a remote location.

In countries like the UK, there is heightened competition for retail customers, and larger utilities must make investments in customer services and enabling technology in order to avoid incursions by more nimble competitors. That large utility will have to compete for customer equipment service business with dedicated contacting and service organizations running advanced omni channel customer relationship management (CRM) systems driven by artificial intelligence.

Energy Sector post COVID-19

Careful asset management

While assets in the energy sector—ranging from offshore platforms to oil refineries to power generation turbines—are long-lived and carefully managed I predict that given market volatility we will see an increased focus on systems to support sound, long-term asset lifecycle management decisions. This means demand in the sector for complete enterprise asset management (EAM) software will increase as executive teams realize they can’t manage what they cannot see. And they will need to see more than they have before—operational cost, output and asset readiness and capacity metrics in context of the goals of the organization. They will need to decide which assets to idle and then manage extensive decommissioning processes. They will need to decide where to build additional capacity or make net new investments, which will require advanced what-if scenario planning.

In 2020, we will see the energy sector looking at project and asset lifecycle management as a strategic solution rather than as pure work management tool to ensure preventive maintenance actions are performed to help reduce operational cost. A move to a more diverse portfolio of generation assets will mean not just reducing operational costs but also to be able to set the most profitable and competitive rate (trading and retailing) based on the generating costs of these different assets. They will look for software and a vendor ecosystem that can help them manage returns on their capital assets by harnessing asset data and either using it for decision support or increased automation.

Do you have questions or comments?

We’d love to hear them so please leave us a message below.

Follow us on social media for the latest blog posts, industry and IFS news!

LinkedIn | Twitter | Facebook

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *